Proposed Pakistan Immigration Authority faces criticism over potential security risks

By Naveed Siddiqui
ISLAMABAD: In a recent development, the proposed Pakistan Immigration Passport and Visa Authority (PIPVA) Ordinance/Act 2024 has come under scrutiny, with various stakeholders expressing concerns about its legal and technical implications.
Critics argue that the proposed ordinance attempts to merge different subjects, potentially complicating the administration of national border management and immigration at international entry and exit points. The induction of five directors from the private sector has sparked worries about the potential compromise of sensitive data, including military and security information.
Objectors stress that matters such as the issuance of passports, emergency travel documents, and visa issuance are within the exclusive jurisdiction of federal law enforcement agencies like the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA).
Section 14, focusing on immigration functions, is criticized for deviating from established practices managed by the FIA since Pakistan’s creation in 1947.
Sections 25 and 26 raise questions about the perceived non-cognizable status of certain offenses and the trial procedures, possibly hindering effective law enforcement. However, Section 35(2) is flagged for its implications on employee benefits, suggesting potential financial ramifications.
Supporters of the Federal Investigation Agency highlight its role as the premier federal law enforcement agency with a mandate covering criminal investigation, border control, counterintelligence, and national security. The agency has a longstanding history of effectively managing international borders and expertise in immigration matters.
Strong recommendations have been put forth, urging policymakers to reconsider entrusting border management and immigration control to an autonomous authority other than the FIA. Advocates emphasize the agency’s proven track record and its alignment with international practices.
Critics warn that the proposed changes could have diplomatic repercussions, especially in the context of the Trafficking in Person Report (TIP Report), which is a crucial tool for engaging foreign governments in anti-trafficking efforts.
As discussions unfold, stakeholders emphasize the need for a careful evaluation of the proposed PIPVA Ordinance/Act 2024, underscoring the importance of addressing raised concerns to ensure the nation’s security and the effective management of international borders.